According to Wikipedia: “United States Presidents issue executive orders to help officers and agencies of the executive branch manage the operations within the federal government itself. Executive orders have the full force of law, since issuances are typically made in pursuance of certain Acts of Congress, some of which specifically delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation), or are believed to take authority from a power granted directly to the Executive by the Constitution.”
“However, these perceived justifications cited by Presidents when authoring Executive Orders have come under criticism for exceeding executive authority; at various times throughout U.S. history, challenges to the legal validity or justification for an order have resulted in legal proceedings.”
I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I am aware of the consequences of past executive orders. The nation now has a rogue government agency, the Environmental Protection Agency, by virtue of an executive order by President Nixon. Later, President Carter reorganized the executive branch and created a separate Department of Education. Currently, executive orders permit the President to seize control of the entire nation in the event of an attack or the declaration of a national emergency.
Now we are told that President Obama is planning to issue up to nineteen executive orders to do an end run around Congress and the Second amendment on the issue of gun control. Whereas Social Security was often referred to as “the third rail” if presidents or Congress attempted to reform it, it would appear that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is the new third raid and touching it is likely to enflame both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.
Former Attorney General, Edwin Meese, recently went on record to say that the proposed executive orders would be an “impeachable offense.” There is a growing chorus of resistance to Obama’s “imperial presidency”, but whether it is the executive orders or a judgment rendered by a forthcoming Supreme Court conference, it would appear that Obama has over-reached.
The Supreme Court has scheduled a conference—not a hearing—regarding a case that challenges President Obama’s eligibility to be President. Court observers believe this will lead nowhere. If the justices were to favor elevating the case to a hearing that found Obama guilty, he could face impeachment hearings or possibly be summarily removed from office by Congress.
For more of the article go to: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52413
The fraud enacts 20+ executive orders!!! Will you and the rest of our lame congress finally take impeachment action? If not have the balls to call him on the fact that he violates his own law shown in his obamacare. Make any law contingent on him proving his eligibility of office!!! If he is so heartened by this then he should want to prove his eligibilty to get these laws passed for these kids that his heart so fakingly goes out to! Plus first to go is all protection for his family!!! My family is just as important to me as his is to him!!
ReplyDeleteLORD Obama flips congress the bird, Congress responds by bending over and enjoying it!!
Take action or resign!!!!
There's the 2nd ammendment... next month is the 1st ammendment!!! Congress as usual bending over and enjoying it!! People stand up and vote everyone of these spineless communists out of office and replace them with someone who will represent you!!!